Thank you very much for your response. This 'bringing into the light' is something I really think can happen too. I'd like to volunteer the thought that in some ways, I have found that re-connecting magic with the art of juggling is one way of extending magic backwards past the point of its formalization. Still, I agree that the gentleman's art has a beauty of its own that I would love to see 'refreshed' by its true roots... I don't actually know much about bizzare magic, per se, but I know the lovecraftian mythos, and would agree that this is a limited way of bridging the gap.... might do the art more harm in some ways by excentuating ugliness and horror.... though, I expect it's awesome too in some way... You know it's occured to me, following the thought of people such as Jung, and some of the french linguistic philosophers that consciousness itself is a little like a conjurer's theatre; built of symbol and structure, such that the 'light' of human attention falls on some things and not others. There is so much wisdom in true magic, and in conjuring too, and I really salute and respect you for voicing this. When you speak of really asking yourself what you give to somebody you show magic to, that strikes me, and I'll make sure to think about it more when I perform. Jeff really does that too. I remember him talking about how magic comes up from the heart and out through the eyes... I imagined it as streams of liquid, golden light...Great images. Keep up the 'Great Work' as they say;
-Mr. Ibis




